第一道

Some people think that extreme sports that are dangerous, such as skydiving and rock-climbing, should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

1. 题目分析

题型：Agree or Disagree

题目中的核心词是：

Should be banned

注意，这不是问极限运动是否危险。

而是在问：

危险是否足以成为全面禁止这类运动的理由？

这是两个不同的问题。

2. 推荐立场

Strongly Disagree：不赞成全面禁止。

但承认极限运动存在风险，应该通过安全监管降低事故发生的可能性。

这个立场非常适合使用：

Individual Freedom VS Public Safety

反对禁止：

成年人应该有权选择自己愿意承担的风险。

支持监管：

政府和相关机构应制定安全标准，减少可避免的伤害。

3. 推荐写作结构

4. 高频语料

5. Band 8参考范文

Should Extreme Sports Be Banned?

Extreme sports, such as skydiving and rock climbing, are often associated with serious physical risks. Consequently, some people argue that these activities should be prohibited. I strongly disagree with this view because individuals should have the freedom to participate in challenging activities, provided that appropriate safety measures are in place.

One reason why extreme sports should remain legal is that adults have the right to make informed decisions about their recreational activities. Many people participate in these sports not simply for excitement but also to challenge themselves physically and mentally. For example, rock climbing requires considerable strength, concentration and problem-solving skills. Successfully completing a difficult climb can help individuals develop confidence and resilience. Banning such activities would therefore prevent people from enjoying experiences that may contribute positively to their personal development.

Another important consideration is that safety regulations are generally more appropriate than outright prohibition. Although extreme sports involve risks, many of these can be reduced through professional training, suitable equipment and proper supervision. For instance, skydiving centres can require beginners to complete safety instruction and jump with qualified instructors. Similarly, climbing facilities can enforce equipment checks and provide experienced staff to supervise participants. These measures allow individuals to enjoy challenging activities while reducing the likelihood of preventable accidents.

Admittedly, certain extreme sports can result in serious injuries, particularly when participants underestimate the dangers involved. However, this does not necessarily justify banning them altogether. Instead, authorities should establish clear safety standards and ensure that operators comply with them.

In conclusion, I believe extreme sports should not be banned simply because they involve danger. A more reasonable approach is to respect individual freedom while introducing effective regulations to protect participants.

Word count: approximately 290 words

6. 这道题最值得积累的论证框架

Ban VS Regulate

这是雅思Task 2里非常值得积累的一个框架。

很多题目会出现：

Should something be banned?

不要马上讨论这个东西有没有缺点。

先区分：

Problem exists ≠ A complete ban is necessary.

例如：

Extreme Sports：

Risk → Safety Training → Reduced Accidents

Mobile Phones：

Distraction → Usage Restrictions → Better Public Environment

Social Media：

Potential Harm → Age-appropriate Regulation → Safer Usage

这个逻辑也可以迁移到电子游戏、手机、广告等限制类话题。

第二道

In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

1. 题目分析

题型：Discuss Both Views and Give Your Opinion

这道题要求讨论两个观点：

观点A：高收入有利于国家发展。

高薪能够吸引人才、激励创新、提高企业竞争力。

观点B：政府应该设置工资上限。

限制极高收入能够缓解收入差距，促进社会公平。

2. 推荐立场

我更推荐：

不赞成设置严格的工资上限，但支持通过税收政策缓解收入不平等。

这个立场比较容易建立完整的论证，因为它能够区分：

• 高收入本身是否有问题。

• 收入差距过大是否需要政府干预。

• 政府应该采用什么方式进行干预。

核心观点：

High salaries are not necessarily harmful, but excessive income inequality requires government attention.

3. 写作结构

4. 高频语料

5. Band 8参考范文

High Salaries and Government Regulation

In many countries, a small proportion of the population earns exceptionally high salaries. While some argue that these earnings benefit the national economy, others believe that governments should impose limits on individual salaries. Although I understand the concerns surrounding income inequality, I believe that strict salary caps would do more harm than good.

Those who support salary restrictions argue that extremely high incomes contribute to economic inequality. When a small group of individuals earns significantly more than the average worker, the gap between the wealthy and the rest of society may widen. This can create social tension, particularly when essential workers struggle to afford housing, healthcare and other basic necessities. Supporters of salary caps therefore believe that limiting excessive earnings could promote a fairer distribution of wealth.

However, I would argue that high salaries can provide important economic benefits. Competitive compensation encourages talented individuals to pursue demanding careers and rewards those who make significant contributions to their industries. For example, highly skilled engineers and researchers may be motivated to develop innovative technologies when their expertise is appropriately rewarded. Imposing strict salary limits could weaken these incentives and make it more difficult for businesses to attract exceptional employees. Furthermore, high earners can contribute substantial tax revenue, which governments can use to improve public services.

In my view, progressive taxation is a more effective solution than imposing salary caps. By requiring higher earners to contribute a larger proportion of their income, governments can address inequality without removing the financial incentives that encourage productivity and innovation.

In conclusion, although excessive income inequality is a legitimate concern, limiting salaries is unlikely to be the best response. Governments should instead use taxation and public investment to distribute economic benefits more fairly.

Word count: approximately 290 words

6. 这道题最值得积累的逻辑

Economic Incentives VS Social Equality

支持高薪：

High Salaries → Motivation → Innovation → Economic Growth

反对过高收入：

Income Inequality → Wealth Gap → Social Tension

更成熟的解决思路：

Progressive Taxation → Public Revenue → Better Public Services

这个逻辑可以迁移到：

• Should governments increase taxes on wealthy people?

• Is income inequality a serious social problem?

• Should governments spend more money on public services?

• Should successful professionals earn significantly more than ordinary workers?

扫描下方二维码

找壹站通小助手了解更多

关注这个公众号

备考路上不孤单

Offer