2026年9月12日|雅思真题【高频范文】补贴 vs. 征税:食品政策的十字路口?//views+your opinion?]

四季读书网 2026-09-25 22:29:26 8 0

Some people think that governments should subsidise healthy foods, while others believe that governments should impose higher taxes on unhealthy foods. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
有些人认为政府应该补贴健康食品，而另一些人则认为政府应该对不健康食品征收更高的税。讨论这两种观点并给出你自己的看法。
本期内容

导读Note

2026年9月机考雅思大作文高频范文

Words: 283
总的来说，这两项政策都能够促进社会健康，但将它们结合起来，会是一种更加实际且可持续的解决方案。

关键点/Key Points

It is often argued that governments should make healthy food more affordable, while others believe that increasing taxes on unhealthy products would be a more effective solution. Although both approaches have their merits, I believe that a combination of subsidies and higher taxes would be the most effective way to improve public health.(描述现象+总起句）—2层（2句）

人们经常争论，政府是否应该让健康食品变得更加便宜，还是应该通过提高不健康食品的税收来解决这个问题。虽然这两种方法都有其优点，但我认为，将食品补贴和提高税收结合起来，是改善公众健康最有效的方法。

On the one hand, subsidising healthy foods could make nutritious choices more accessible to everyone, particularly people on lower incomes. Fresh fruit, vegetables, whole grains and other healthy products can sometimes be more expensive than processed food. If governments providedfinancial support to farmers and producers, these foods could become cheaper for consumers. As a result, people might be more likely to choose healthier options in their everyday diets. Furthermore, such a policy would encourage the production and consumption of nutritious food without directly restricting people's freedom of choice.——3层(5句）

一方面，补贴健康食品可以让每个人都更容易负担得起营养食品，尤其是低收入人群。新鲜水果、蔬菜、全谷物以及其他健康食品有时比加工食品更加昂贵。如果政府向农民和食品生产商提供经济补贴，这些食品的价格就可能降低。因此，人们在日常饮食中可能更愿意选择健康食品。此外，这种政策能够在不直接限制人们选择自由的情况下，鼓励健康食品的生产和消费。

On the other hand, imposing higher taxes on unhealthy foods could discourage excessive consumption. Products that contain large amounts of sugar, salt and unhealthy fats are often cheap and widely available. If their prices increased, consumers might reduce their intake or switch to healthier alternatives. In addition, the revenue generated from these taxes could be invested in public healthcare, nutrition education and programmes aimed at preventing obesity and other diet-related diseases.——3层（4句话）

此另一方面，提高不健康食品的税收可以减少人们过量消费这些食品。这些含有大量糖、盐和不健康脂肪的产品通常价格低廉，而且容易购买。如果它们的价格上涨，消费者可能会减少摄入量，或者转而选择更加健康的替代品。此外，由这些税收产生的收入还可以投入公共医疗、营养教育以及预防肥胖和其他饮食相关疾病的项目中。

In my view, however, taxation aloneis unlikely to solve the problem, because simply making unhealthy food more expensive does not necessarily make healthy food affordable.Governments should therefore adoptboth measures simultaneously. Subsidisingnutritious products would make healthy choices easier, while taxes on unhealthy foods would discourage excessive consumption. This balanced approach could influence eating habits without placing an unreasonable burden on consumers.——2层（3句）

在我看来，仅仅依靠提高税收并不足以解决这一问题，因为让不健康食品变得更加昂贵，并不一定意味着健康食品就会变得更加实惠。因此，政府应该同时采取这两种措施。补贴营养食品可以让人们更容易做出健康的选择，而对不健康食品征收更高的税则可以减少过量消费。这种平衡的方法能够影响人们的饮食习惯，同时不会给消费者带来过重的经济负担。

Overall, both policies can contribute to a healthier society, but using them together would provide a more practical and sustainable solution.——2层（3句）