大家好，我是Austin；15年雅思、GMAT一线教学经验，日常分享英语学习提升经验，欢迎关注和交流。
————————
本题为2026年10月雅思写作真题。
9月机考题库已更新至62篇，使用方法：雅思写作稳6.5邪修，一周搞定30篇机考真题
10月考试的同学，直接看题库高频即可，想要，直接评论区留言告诉我~
范文均采用不超过B2水平的词汇（4000-5000词汇量），达到7-7.5分的水平；更易于学习观点扩展、积累高频可迁移语料。
Some people think that the use of mobiles (cell) phones should be banned in public places such as in libraries, shops and on public transport.
To what extent do you agree and disagree?
Many people argue that mobile phones should be banned in public places, and their main concern is noise. While I accept that careless use of these devices can disturb others, I disagree with a total ban, because they have become necessary for everyday public life.
Intro：
S1 复述题目：大城市住房短缺让许多普通居民生活艰难，这确实是政府必须出手解决的问题
S2 表明立场：但不认同"只有政府能解决"，其他群体同样有能力缓解压力
S1 复述题目：许多人主张在公共场所禁用手机，主要担忧是噪音
S2 表明立场：承认随意使用确实会打扰他人，但反对全面禁止，因为手机已成为公共生活必需
The main reason people want a ban is noise. Ringtones, loud conversations, and videos played without earphones can interrupt the people nearby. In a library, for example, a person talking loudly on the phone can stop everyone around from concentrating on their reading. Yet this disturbance comes from careless and impolite behaviour rather than the device itself, and a total ban would unfairly punish people who use their phones properly.
Body 1：
S1 论点：人们想禁手机，主要原因是噪音
S2 解释：铃声、大声通话、不用耳机放视频，都会打断周围的人
S3 例证：在图书馆里，一个人大声打电话，就能让周围所有人无法专心阅读
S4 转折：但干扰来自粗心无礼的行为，而不是设备本身；全面禁止会连带惩罚使用得当的人
Even putting fairness aside, a complete ban is simply impractical. Many everyday activities in public now depend on phones. People pay with them in shops, and on buses and trains they buy tickets and check routes on their screens. If these devices were removed from public places, none of those activities could continue, and thus normal daily life would be disrupted. A more sensible approach is therefore to control how people use phones in public, rather than removing the phones themselves.
Body 2：
S1 论点2（递进）：就算不谈公平，全面禁止也根本不现实
S2 解释：如今许多公共场合的日常活动都依赖手机
S3 例证：人们在商店用手机付款，在公交和地铁上用屏幕买票、查路线
S4 结果：若把这些设备从公共场所移除，这些活动都无法继续，正常生活会因此被打乱
S5 回扣+给方案：更合理的做法是管控使用方式，而不是拿走手机本身
In conclusion, while it is reasonable to worry about the disturbance from phones, banning them everywhere is neither fair nor possible. A better approach is to introduce clear rules that control the behaviours which disturb others, and to punish those who break them.
Con：
S1 收束：担心手机带来干扰是合理的，但处处禁用既不公平也不可行
S2 升华：更好的做法是制定清晰规则来约束打扰他人的行为，并惩罚违规者
ban mobile phones in public places（在公共场所禁用手机）
a total ban / a complete ban（全面禁止）
public transport（公共交通）
the device itself（设备本身）
loud conversations（大声通话）
interrupt the people nearby（打断周围的人）
concentrate on their reading（无法专心阅读）
disturb others（打扰他人）
careless and impolite behaviour（粗心无礼的行为）
unfairly punish（不公平地惩罚）
putting fairness aside（先不谈公平）
be simply impractical（根本不现实）
disrupt normal daily life（打乱日常生活）
use their phones properly（恰当地使用手机）
pay with them in shops（在商店用手机付款）
check routes on their screens（在屏幕上查路线）
remove these devices from public places（把这些设备从公共场所移除）
control how people use phones（管控人们使用手机的方式）
a more sensible approach（更合理的做法）
introduce clear rules（制定清晰的规则）
punish those who break them（惩罚违规者）
everyday activities depend on phones（日常活动依赖手机）
neither fair nor possible（既不公平也不可行）
————————
我是Austin施主，专注低分拔高、高效出分（训练营、一对一）；
看完文章，别忘了点点赞！谢谢！
