3月28日托福写作真题

3月28日托福写作真题及范文

邮件

You recently borrowed a book from your school library. Unfortunately, the book was damaged while it was in your care (for example, some pages were torn, the cover was bent, or water was spilled on it). You feel responsible for what happened and want to apologize to the library administrator. You also want to find out the correct way to handle the situation and make it right.

Write an email to the library administrator. In your email, do the following:

• Apologize for damaging the library book and clearly take responsibility

• Explain briefly what happened and describe the damage.

• Ask what you should do next and offer to replace the book or pay any required fee.

范文

Dear Library Administrator,

I am writing to sincerely apologize for damaging a library book that I recently borrowed. I take full responsibility for what happened.

Unfortunately, I accidentally spilled some water on the book while studying, and a few pages became wrinkled. In addition, the cover was bent during the incident. I feel very sorry because I understand that library materials should be handled carefully.

Could you please let me know what I should do next? I am willing to replace the book or pay any required fee to make up for the damage.

Sincerely,  

Mike

学术

Dr. Diaz

We have been discussing the environmental impact of the fashion industry. Some people believe that fashion design and the constant production of new clothing styles seriously harm the environment because they require large amounts of water, energy, and raw materials. Others argue that fashion design is not necessarily harmful, since companies can use sustainable materials, improve production methods, and encourage more responsible consumption. Do you think fashion design by companies is harmful to the environment? Explain your opinion clearly and use specific reasons.

Kelly

I think fashion design by companies can be harmful to the environment. In order to keep up with trends, many companies produce clothes very quickly and in large quantities. This often leads to waste, overconsumption, and pollution from factories. In addition, a lot of clothing is thrown away after a short time, which increases environmental pressure. For these reasons, I believe the fashion industry often causes more harm than people realize.

Andrew

I believe fashion design is not always harmful to the environment. The problem is not design itself, but the way companies choose to produce and sell their products. Some businesses now use recycled fabrics, reduce packaging waste, and create clothes that last longer. Fashion can also raise awareness of sustainability if companies make environmental responsibility part of their brand. Therefore, fashion design can become less damaging if it is managed in a more responsible way.

范文

I agree with Kelly that fashion design by companies is often harmful to the environment because it encourages wasteful production and consumption.

I also think the fashion industry can be especially damaging because it uses large amounts of natural resources in order to keep up with fast-changing trends. Specifically, many companies produce clothing quickly and in huge quantities, which requires a great deal of water, energy, and raw materials. As a result, this process often creates pollution and unnecessary waste before the products are even sold.

In addition, fashion design can lead to overconsumption by encouraging people to buy new clothes more often than they really need. When styles change rapidly, consumers may throw away perfectly usable clothing after a short time, which increases environmental pressure and landfill waste.

I understand Andrew’s point that companies can use recycled materials and more responsible methods, but in reality, the industry’s overall pattern of mass production often causes more environmental harm than people realize.

邮件

You are a college student taking a biology course. You have been struggling with some recent assignments and have decided to seek help from your professor, Dr. Smith. You want to understand the topics better and improve your grades.

Write an email to Dr. Smith. In your email, do the following:

• Mention the specific topics you are struggling with.

• Ask for suggestions on how to improve your understanding.

• Request a meeting with Dr. Smith to discuss further.

范文

Dear Dr. Smith,

I hope you are doing well. I am writing because I have been struggling with some recent assignments in our biology course and would like to ask for your help.

In particular, I am having difficulty understanding cell respiration and genetics. I have reviewed my notes, but I still feel unsure about some key concepts and how to apply them correctly in assignments.

Could you please suggest some ways to improve my understanding? If possible, I would also like to request a meeting with you sometime this week to discuss these topics further.

Sincerely,  

Mike

学术

Dr. Diaz

We' ve been discussing how companies should allocate their resources to achieve long-term success. Some people argue that companies should invest more in employee training and development programs because skilled workers can improve product quality, customer satisfaction, and innovation. Others believe companies should focus on lowering the price of their products to attract more customers, increase sales volume, and gain market share. What do you think? For a company' s long-term success, is it more effective to invest in employee training and development programs, or to lower the price of its products? Why?

Andrew

I believe investing in employee training and development programs is better for a company's long-term success. Well-trained employees work more efficiently, make fewer mistakes, and provide better customer service, which improves product quality and strengthens the brand. Training also increases employee confidence and job satisfaction, so people are more likely to stay with the company, reducing turnover costs . Over time, this creates a skilled workforce that can adapt to changes and innovate. Lowering prices might increase sales in the short term, but it can reduce profit margins and push the company into price competition. For long-term growth, building strong internal capability is more reliable.

Claire

I disagree. Lowering the price of a product can be more beneficial for long-term success because it attracts more customers and helps a company gain market share. When prices are competitive, more people are willing to try the product, and the company can build a larger customer base. With higher sales volume, the company may also benefit from economies of scale, which can reduce production costs over time. In addition, if customers become loyal, they may keep buying even when prices rise later. Training programs are valuable, but they cost money and take time to show results. Therefore, lowering prices can be a more practical long-term strategy, especially in highly competitive markets.

范文

I agree with Andrew that investing in employee training and development programs is better for a company’s long-term success because it builds stronger internal capability.

I also think training is especially valuable because it improves the underlying quality of a company rather than only creating short-term results. Specifically, well-trained employees usually work more efficiently, make fewer mistakes, and provide better service to customers. As a result, the company can improve product quality, strengthen its reputation, and adapt more successfully to future challenges.

In addition, employee development can increase confidence, job satisfaction, and loyalty among workers. When employees feel supported and continue improving their skills, they are often more motivated to stay with the company and contribute to innovation over time. This helps the business remain stable and competitive in the long run.

I understand Claire’s point that lowering prices can attract more customers, but price advantages are often temporary, while a skilled and adaptable workforce usually creates more lasting success.

邮件

You are a student who recently participated in a group project for your marketing class. One of your group members, Lisa, did an excellent job on her part of the project.

Write an email to Lisa. In your email, do the following:

• Thank her for her excellent contribution to the group project.

• Explain what part of Lisa's contribution you appreciated most and how her efforts helped the team succeed.

• Suggest working together on future projects and asking for her opinion.

范文

Dear Lisa,

I want to thank you for your excellent contribution to our marketing group project. You did a fantastic job, and I really appreciate your effort.

What I appreciated most was your research and the way you organized our presentation. Your ideas were clear and practical, and they helped the whole team stay focused. Because of your hard work, our project became much stronger and more polished.

I really enjoyed working with you. I hope we can work together on future projects as well. I would also love to hear your opinion on how our team could improve next time.

Sincerely,  

Mike

学术

Dr. Diaz

We have been discussing decision-making styles in organizations. Some people believe that when one strong leader makes decisions alone, work can move faster and more efficiently. Others argue that teamwork leads to better results because more people can share ideas and help improve the final decision. Think about situations at school, work, or in group projects. Do you think decisions are better when made by one leader or by the whole team? Explain your opinion clearly and use specific reasons.

Kelly

I think decisions made by one leader are often better because they save time and reduce confusion. In many situations, especially when there is pressure or a deadline, a team may spend too much time discussing different opinions. A strong leader can evaluate the options quickly and choose the best plan. This makes the group more efficient and helps everyone move forward without delay.

Andrew

I believe team decision-making usually produces better results because it includes different perspectives and ideas. One leader may act quickly, but that person can also overlook important details or make biased choices. When team members share their opinions, they can catch problems early and improve the final plan. In addition, people are often more motivated to support a decision when they helped make it.

范文

I agree with Andrew that decisions are usually better when made by the whole team because collaboration often improves the quality of the final result.

I also think teamwork is especially effective because it allows people to contribute different perspectives and notice problems that one leader might miss. Specifically, when team members share ideas, they can identify weaknesses in a plan, catch important details early, and suggest more balanced solutions. As a result, the final decision is often more thoughtful and less likely to reflect the bias of a single person.

In addition, team decision-making can increase people’s motivation and sense of responsibility. When individuals feel that their opinions are heard and respected, they are usually more willing to support the decision and work hard to make it successful. This often leads to stronger cooperation and more consistent execution afterward.

I understand Kelly’s point that one strong leader can save time and reduce confusion, but better participation and higher-quality decisions are usually more valuable in the long run.