恭喜我的学生，雅思写作拿7分
你好呀，我是来自加拿大的雅思外教Mac。今天，和你分享2026年3月21日雅思大作文真题的高分范文。
题目：
Some people say that historical sites should be completely closed while others say that historical sites should be open for the public to visit. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
有人认为历史遗迹应完全关闭，而另一些人则认为历史遗迹应向公众开放供参观。请讨论双方观点并给出你的看法。
题型说明：
Type（题型）：Discuss and Opinion (public should be able to access)（讨论 + 观点：公众应可进入）
Key words（核心词汇）：historical sites should be completely closed（历史遗迹应完全关闭）/should be open（应开放）/discuss（讨论）/give opinion（给出观点）
写作大纲：
Body 1（主体段 1）：why historical sites should not be open to the public; damage and deterioration（历史遗迹不应向公众开放的原因：损坏与恶化）
Body 2（主体段 2）：why they should be open; allows people to better understand our common history（历史遗迹应开放的原因：让人们更好地了解共同历史）
- Model Answer 高分范文 & 范文朗读 -
▲范文音频戳这里▲
There are those who argue that historical sites should be closed off to the public in order to preserve them, whereas others contend such locations ought to remain accessible to visitors. This essay shall explore both viewpoints; however, I believe historical sites should remain open to the public provided that appropriate safeguards are implemented to ensure their long-term preservation.
One of the main reasons, according to some, closing historical sites to the public should be undertaken is that constant human activity can cause irreversible damage. Ancient structures, delicate artifacts, and fragile surfaces are often vulnerable to erosion, pollution, and physical contact, meaning that even well-intentioned visitors may gradually facilitate the deterioration of these locations and objects. As tourist numbers dramatically increase in many parts of the world, authorities may also struggle to control overcrowding, a situation that now regularly occurs at some tourist sites in Europe during the summer holidays, which can accelerate structural wear and threaten the integrity of these irreplaceable landmarks.
Nevertheless, preventing public access entirely would undermine the broader cultural and educational value of historical sites. These places represent the collective heritage of humanity, allowing individuals to witness the architectural achievements, traditions, and historical development of different civilizations, thereby fostering a deeper appreciation of cultural identity. Although preservation must remain a priority, governments can implement measures such as visitor limits, designated pathways, and conservation monitoring so that the public can experience such sites while their structural integrity remains carefully protected. Ultimately, by allowing visitors access, site custodians can ensure, through properly safeguarding the integrity of national heritage locations, the opportunity for present and future generations to appreciate our collective history.
In conclusion, although closing historical sites might reduce the risk of physical damage, doing so would deny people the opportunity to engage directly with, and appreciate, our shared past, and should, therefore, remain open to visitors provided that carefully designed protective measures can ensure their preservation.
有人认为，为保护历史遗迹，应将其对公众关闭；而另一些人则主张，此类场所应保持对游客开放。本文将探讨这两种观点；然而，我认为，只要实施适当的保护措施以确保其长期保存，历史遗迹就应继续向公众开放。
历史遗迹应对公众关闭的主要原因之一是持续的人类活动会造成不可逆的损坏。古代建筑、易碎文物和脆弱的表面往往易受侵蚀、污染和物理接触的影响，这意味着即使是出于好意的游客，也可能逐渐加剧这些场所和物品的损坏。随着世界许多地区的游客数量大幅增加，当局可能难以控制过度拥挤的情况 —— 如今欧洲部分旅游景点在暑期经常出现这种情况，这会加速建筑磨损，并威胁到这些不可替代地标建筑的完整性。
然而，完全禁止公众进入会削弱历史遗迹更广泛的文化和教育价值。这些场所代表着人类的共同遗产，让人们能够见证不同文明的建筑成就、传统和历史发展，从而加深对文化认同的理解与珍视。尽管保护必须始终是首要任务，但政府可以实施诸如限制游客数量、设置指定通道和进行保护监测等措施，这样公众就能在这些遗迹的结构完整性得到精心保护的前提下，体验这些场所。归根结底，通过允许游客进入，遗迹管理者能够通过妥善保护国家遗产场所的完整性，确保当代和后代都有机会欣赏我们的共同历史。
总之，尽管关闭历史遗迹可能会降低物理损坏的风险，但这样做会剥夺人们直接接触和欣赏我们共同历史的机会。因此，只要精心设计的保护措施能够确保其保存，历史遗迹就应继续向游客开放。
- Essay Analysis 范文解析 -
There are those who argue that historical sites should be closed off to the public in order to preserve them, whereas others contend such locations ought to remain accessible to visitors. This essay shall explore both viewpoints; however, I believe historical sites should remain open to the public provided that appropriate safeguards are implemented to ensure their long-term preservation.
有人认为，为保护历史遗迹，应将其对公众关闭；而另一些人则主张，此类场所应保持对游客开放。本文将探讨这两种观点；然而，我认为，只要实施适当的保护措施以确保其长期保存，历史遗迹就应继续向公众开放。
Paraphrasing from the Statement/Question（题目改写）
Some people say that = There are those who argue that 有人认为
completely closed = closed off to the public 完全关闭 = 对公众关闭
while = whereas 然而
say that = contend 认为
historical sites = such locations 历史遗迹 = 此类场所
should be = ought to 应该
open for the public to visit = remain accessible to visitors 向公众开放供参观 = 保持对游客开放
Standard Phrase for the “Discuss & Opinion” type essay 讨论 + 观点类作文标准句式
There are those who argue that 有人认为
, whereas others 而另一些人
This essay shall explore both viewpoints; however, I believe 本文将探讨双方观点；然而我认为
Words showing Cohesion (C&C) 连贯与衔接词汇 / 短语
in order to 为了
them 它们（指代历史遗迹）
, whereas others 而另一些人
such locations 此类场所
This 这（指代前文观点）
; however 然而
provided that 只要
their 它们的（指代历史遗迹的）
Vocabulary 核心词汇
contend 认为；主张
accessible 可进入的；可接近的
appropriate safeguards 适当的保护措施
to ensure 确保
long-term preservation 长期保护
Aspects that must be referred to（必须涉及的要点）：
why historical sites should not be open to the public; damage and deterioration 历史遗迹不应向公众开放的原因：损坏与恶化
One of the main reasons, according to some, closing historical sites to the public should be undertaken is that constant human activity can cause irreversible damage. Ancient structures, delicate artifacts, and fragile surfaces are often vulnerable to erosion, pollution, and physical contact, meaning that even well-intentioned visitors may gradually facilitate the deterioration of these locations and objects. As tourist numbers dramatically increase in many parts of the world, authorities may also struggle to control overcrowding, a situation that now regularly occurs at some tourist sites in Europe during the summer holidays, which can accelerate structural wear and threaten the integrity of these irreplaceable landmarks.
一些人认为，历史遗迹应对公众关闭的主要原因之一是持续的人类活动会造成不可逆的损坏。古代建筑、易碎文物和脆弱的表面往往易受侵蚀、污染和物理接触的影响，这意味着即使是出于好意的游客，也可能逐渐加剧这些场所和物品的损坏。随着世界许多地区的游客数量大幅增加，当局可能难以控制过度拥挤的情况 —— 如今欧洲部分旅游景点在暑期经常出现这种情况，这会加速建筑磨损，并威胁到这些不可替代地标建筑的完整性。
Standard IELTS essay phrase（雅思作文标准句式）
One of the main reasons, according to some, … is that 一些人认为，…… 的主要原因之一是
Vocabulary and Collocations 词汇与搭配
undertaken 实施；采取
constant human activity 持续的人类活动
irreversible damage 不可逆的损坏
ancient structures 古代建筑
delicate artifacts 易碎文物
fragile surfaces 脆弱的表面
vulnerable to 易受…… 影响
erosion 侵蚀
physical contact 物理接触
well-intentioned 出于好意的
facilitate 加剧；促进
the deterioration of …… 的损坏；…… 的恶化
tourist numbers 游客数量
dramatically increase 大幅增加
in many parts of the world 世界许多地区
struggle to control 难以控制
overcrowding 过度拥挤
tourist sites 旅游景点
the summer holidays 暑期
accelerate 加速
structural wear 建筑磨损
threaten the integrity of 威胁…… 的完整性
irreplaceable landmarks 不可替代的地标建筑
Words Showing Cohesion [Signposting words, conjunctions, relative pronouns] (C&C) 连贯与衔接词汇 / 短语 [指示词、连词、关系代词]
is that 是（引导表语从句）
can cause 会造成
often 往往；常常
, meaning that even 这意味着即使
may gradually 可能逐渐
these locations and objects 这些场所和物品
As 随着
, authorities 当局
also 也
, a 一种（指代前文的过度拥挤情况）
that （引导定语从句，修饰 situation）
now regularly 如今经常
during 在…… 期间
, which can 这会（引导非限制性定语从句）
these 这些（指代历史遗迹）
Aspects that must be referred to（必须涉及的要点）：
why they should be open; allows people to better understand our common history 历史遗迹应开放的原因：让人们更好地了解共同历史
Nevertheless, preventing public access entirely would undermine the broader cultural and educational value of historical sites. These places represent the collective heritage of humanity, allowing individuals to witness the architectural achievements, traditions, and historical development of different civilizations, thereby fostering a deeper appreciation of cultural identity. Although preservation must remain a priority, governments can implement measures such as visitor limits, designated pathways, and conservation monitoring so that the public can experience such sites while their structural integrity remains carefully protected. Ultimately, by allowing visitors access, site custodians can ensure, through properly safeguarding the integrity of national heritage locations, the opportunity for present and future generations to appreciate our collective history.
然而，完全禁止公众进入会削弱历史遗迹更广泛的文化和教育价值。这些场所代表着人类的共同遗产，让人们能够见证不同文明的建筑成就、传统和历史发展，从而加深对文化认同的理解与珍视。尽管保护必须始终是首要任务，但政府可以实施诸如限制游客数量、设置指定通道和进行保护监测等措施，这样公众就能在这些遗迹的结构完整性得到精心保护的前提下，体验这些场所。归根结底，通过允许游客进入，遗迹管理者能够通过妥善保护国家遗产场所的完整性，确保当代和后代都有机会欣赏我们的共同历史。
Standard IELTS essay phrase 雅思作文标准句式
Nevertheless 然而
Vocabulary and Collocations 词汇与搭配
preventing public access 禁止公众进入
undermine 削弱；损害
the broader cultural and educational value of …… 更广泛的文化和教育价值
the collective heritage of humanity 人类的共同遗产
architectural achievements 建筑成就
historical development 历史发展
civilizations 文明
a deeper appreciation of 对…… 更深刻的理解与珍视
cultural identity 文化认同
preservation 保护
remain a priority 始终是首要任务
implement measures 实施措施
visitor limits 限制游客数量
designated pathways 指定通道
conservation monitoring 保护监测
structural integrity 结构完整性
custodians 管理者；监护人
safeguarding 保护；维护
the integrity of national heritage locations 国家遗产场所的完整性
the opportunity for …… 的机会
present and future generations 当代和后代
to appreciate 欣赏；领略
our collective history 我们的共同历史
Words Showing Cohesion [Signposting words, conjunctions, relative pronouns] (C&C) 连贯与衔接词汇 / 短语 [指示词、连词、关系代词]
Nevertheless 然而
entirely 完全地
These places 这些场所
, allowing 让（现在分词短语作状语）
, thereby fostering 从而（现在分词短语作结果状语）
Although 尽管
must 必须
, governments can 政府可以
such as 诸如
so that 这样；以便（引导目的状语从句）
such sites 此类场所
while 在…… 的前提下（引导让步状语从句）
their 它们的（指代历史遗迹的）
Ultimately 归根结底
, by allowing 通过允许（介词短语作方式状语）
, site custodians 遗迹管理者
can ensure 能够确保
, through 通过（介词短语作方式状语）
properly 妥善地
In conclusion, although closing historical sites might reduce the risk of physical damage, doing so would deny people the opportunity to engage directly with, and appreciate, our shared past, and should, therefore, remain open to visitors provided that carefully designed protective measures can ensure their preservation.
总之，尽管关闭历史遗迹可能会降低物理损坏的风险，但这样做会剥夺人们直接接触和欣赏我们共同历史的机会。因此，只要精心设计的保护措施能够确保其保存，历史遗迹就应继续向游客开放。
Standard IELTS essay phrase 雅思作文标准句式
In conclusion, although 总之，尽管
Vocabulary and Collocations 词汇与搭配
reduce the risk of 降低…… 的风险
physical damage 物理损坏
deny people the opportunity to 剥夺人们…… 的机会
engage directly with 直接接触
carefully designed protective measures 精心设计的保护措施
preservation 保存；保护
Words Showing Cohesion [Signposting words, conjunctions, relative pronouns] (C&C) 连贯与衔接词汇 / 短语 [指示词、连词、关系代词]
, although 尽管（引导让步状语从句）
, doing so 这样做（指代前文的关闭历史遗迹）
, and 并且（连接并列谓语）
, our 我们的
, therefore 因此
provided that 只要（引导条件状语从句）
- Score Summary 分数点评 -
Task Response (TR)：8 分
Fully addresses task by clearly discussing both viewpoints and presenting a consistent opinion.
通过清晰讨论双方观点并呈现一致的个人立场，完全回应了题目要求。
Writer’s position is clearly stated in the introduction and reaffirmed in the conclusion.
作者的立场在引言中明确提出，并在结论中得到重申。
Each body paragraph focuses on a distinct argument, with the first explaining preservation concerns and the second presenting the cultural and educational importance of public access.
每个主体段围绕一个明确论点展开，第一段阐释了保护方面的担忧，第二段阐述了公众进入的文化和教育重要性。
Ideas are clearly extended through logical explanation, particularly regarding the risks posed by tourism and the broader value of historical awareness.
观点通过合理阐释得到清晰延伸，尤其是关于旅游业带来的风险以及历史认知的更广泛价值。
A relevant contextual reference to overcrowding at European tourist sites is given, strengthening the explanation of the preservation argument.
提及了欧洲旅游景点过度拥挤的相关背景，强化了关于保护观点的阐释。
Coherence and Cohesion (C&C)：8 分
The essay is logically organised into four clear paragraphs with a clear progression of ideas.
文章逻辑清晰，分为四个明确段落，观点推进流畅。
Cohesive devices such as “nevertheless,” “although,” and “ultimately,” are used appropriately.
衔接手段使用恰当。
Each paragraph maintains a clear central focus and contributes directly to the overall argument.
每个段落都有明确的核心焦点，直接服务于整体论点。
Referencing such as “these places,” “such sites,” and “these locations” helps reduce repetition.
指代用法有助于减少重复。
Lexical Resource (LR)：8 分
Demonstrates a wide range of precise vocabulary appropriate for an academic discussion.
展现了丰富且精准的词汇，适合学术讨论语境。
Strong collocations appear throughout the essay, including “irreversible damage,” “structural wear,” “collective heritage of humanity,” and “long-term preservation.”
全文出现大量地道搭配。
Topic-specific terminology such as “site custodians,” “designated pathways,” and “conservation monitoring” enhances lexical sophistication.
大量话题相关词汇提升了词汇的专业性。
Vocabulary is used accurately and naturally with very few instances of awkward phrasing.
词汇运用准确自然，仅有极少数表达稍显生硬。
Minor repetition of words such as “sites” and “preservation” occurs but does not reduce clarity or lexical effectiveness.
部分词汇存在轻微重复，但不影响表达清晰度和词汇使用效果。
Grammatical Range & Accuracy (GRA)：8 分
Demonstrates a strong range of complex sentence structures, including subordinate clauses and participial clauses.
有效运用了多种复杂句式，包括从句和分词从句。
Sentences are well controlled with accurate punctuation and clause management.
句子掌控力强，标点符号使用准确，从句运用规范。
Relative clauses and participial structures are used effectively to extend and connect ideas.
关系从句和分词结构运用娴熟，有效延伸并衔接观点。
Complex sentences are generally clear and grammatically accurate throughout the essay.
全文复杂句表达清晰，语法准确。
Some sentences contain dense clause structures, but they remain grammatically correct and understandable.
部分句子语法结构稍显复杂，但仍保持语法正确且易于理解。
【英语考试Cat】知识星球上新啦！
《雅思小作文柱状图范文集》
《雅思小作文折线图范文集》
每篇都标注了得分点分析（为啥这篇作文能得X分），
把高分短语、衔接词、词汇都单独列出来了。
这个范文集放在了我的知识星球，星球里除了这本书，还有10万字的雅思口语书👇，听说读写、语法基础知识等内容。
星球目前的价格是388元/年，欢迎加入。如不适合，星球可以3天无理由退款，付的款会原路返还给你。
👇
👇
欢迎朋友们加入我的【知识星球】
加入「英语考试Cat」的知识星球，你将获得：
等等。
注意：星球不含雅思作文批改服务。
388元/年，3天无理由退款。
- 高分范文，部分范文有音频二维码
- 必备句型 、写作技巧
- 考前急救包
- 加分模板
- 雅思机考记
咨询或者报名雅思课
👇
- End -
如果喜欢，请帮忙点赞、转发分享一下
感谢！🐱🐱
